Ian Ward <[email protected]> writes: > Tony Narlock has suggested switching the Urwid license to an MIT or > BSD license. He's raised some issues with LGPL and the difficulty of > interpreting it with a Python library like Urwid. > > https://github.com/wardi/urwid/issues/41 > > I'm not opposed to the idea, but it will involve contacting quite a > few contributors to get their permission. If some people don't give > permission then we would have to consider if switching licenses was > worth removing their work from Urwid. i.e. this is not fun or > interesting work, but it might be good for the library. > > If you have relevant information for this discussion, please add it to > the ticket above. > > I contribute code to proprietary commercial, AGPL, GPL, LGPL, and > BSD/MIT licensed projects. I'm not interested in the politics of > licensing, just the practical advantages and disadvantages. I also > don't want to start a flame war here on our peaceful mailing list.
FWIW, +1 for MIT/BSD-ish. Andreas
pgpw4qhoNON0U.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Urwid mailing list [email protected] http://lists.excess.org/mailman/listinfo/urwid
