On 6/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right. I was thinking about the same thing (people will probably know what > Quicktime and Windows Media Video mean, but Ogg Theora...). > > I think your description is too vague though. Probably something like > "Windows video (AVI)" or "Apple video (Quicktime)", but i'll let other > people (translators) come up with better descriptions :)
The usability and/or doc people are a lot more appropriate than the translators :) *cough* usability folks, back me up here *cough* :) Other than this, I find the dialog really quite nice- really glad to see someone tackling it- will be really nice to have- insert more incoherent but really happy mumblings here- Thanks! Luis > > On 6/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> CC me please (i'm not subscribed to the list). > >> > >> Corey: the reason the video type is there is for the following use-case: > >> > >> - You record a video for yourself. Ogg Theora is fine (OSS codec and > >> all). > >> - You record a video for your Apple/Windows friend who doesn't have Ogg > >> Theora installed. You then select either Quicktime or WMV so his native > >> player can play it ok. > > > > Then the labels should probably be something like 'viewable on all > > platforms', 'viewable with Free Software only' [this is not > > strictly-speaking accurate, but it is more informative than Ogg, etc., > > to the average user.] > > > > Luis > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Usability mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
