On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 11:25 pm, Rodney Dawes worote > On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 18:56 +0100, Mateusz �oskot wrote: >> Ross Burton wrote: >> > On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 16:25 +0100, Mateusz �oskot wrote: >> >> Excause me, I've not expressed it precisely. >> >> I tried to say that I Nautilus file manager + desktop is highly >> >> integrated >> >> with GNOME, so currently there is no good substition. >> > >> > That's not correct, nautilus is integrated into GNOME as it's the >> > default desktop and file manager. >> >> And IMHO this integration is a problem. > > Not really. Nautilus can be completely done away with, and GNOME in > general will still function quite happily.
I've not tried but I suppose it's not so straightforward as you are saying. >> > If someone wants to run an >> > alternative, there is no reason why that isn't possible. >> >> I didn't say it isn't possible, but running alternate file manager >> Nautilus integration to GNOME desktop is still present. What for? > > You didn't completely remove Nautilus then. It's probably still in your > session and still controlling the icons on the desktop. If you want a > different file manager to do this, you will have to configure Nautilus > to not do it. OK, I will try to do so. > Having said all that... What does the file manager have to do with the > print dialog? If you want to start a new thread, please start a new > thread. Diverging an existing thread for your own purposes is rude, and > makes it difficult to read the original thread, or yours, as the two > become quite intertwined. Ironic for someone complaining about how the > Nautilus file manager is so heavily integrated. :) I understand but I replied not to printing dialog but the more general topic Linus' started, parallely in the same post. Cheers -- Mateusz Łoskot http://mateusz.loskot.net _______________________________________________ Usability mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
