On Jan 23, 2007, at 12:19 AM, Robert Staudinger wrote:
>
> On 1/22/07, Matthew Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Jan 22, 2007, at 8:03 PM, Robert Staudinger wrote:
> ...
>>> ------------------------- --------
>>> |123                     | cm <> |
>>> ------------------------- --------
> ...
>> If the field is really that wide, there is something wrong with the
>> window layout. The width of fields should be at least roughly
>> proportionate to the length of the data people are likely to enter in
>> them (though it's best to avoid using more than two or three lengths 
>> in a single window).
>
> Unfortunately it isn't always that easy. Even the HIG's own examples
> come with wide GtkEntry and combo-box/option-menu widgets:
> http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gup/hig/2.0/design-window.html

That's because they're quite likely to contain long strings. Nothing 
wrong with that.

> That should of course not be an excuse whatsoever, just some support
> for the argument that widget size cannot always easily be constrained.
> ...

Setting the width of controls is one of the few things that *is* easy 
in Glade.

Cheers
-- 
Matthew Paul Thomas
http://mpt.net.nz/

_______________________________________________
Usability mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability

Reply via email to