On Feb 25, 2007, at 11:15 PM, Thorsten Wilms wrote: > ... > How could indication of secondary (or higher) sorting be unnecessary > without it also being unnecessary for primary sorting, since you > can determine the sorting from the results? > ...
That's an interesting question. I think the answer is probably that people care about sorting by one column much more often than they care about sorting by two or more. Cheers -- Matthew Paul Thomas http://mpt.net.nz/ _______________________________________________ Usability mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
