https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260783
--- Comment #3 from Andriy Gapon <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Daniel O'Connor from comment #0) Is CH341K a real product name? My internet search did not turn up anything for it. Perhaps it's just another CH341 variant that does not need a distinguished name? Then it could be added as CH341SER_3 or something... Also, in that case it probably does not deserve a distinct device_printf either. I mean, why distinguish it from other variants if the driver does not have any special cases for it. P.S. based on more research it seems that the chip is actually CH340K. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
