Whoa a one time fee? I thought the certificate was a one year certificate? Bob
On Jan 14, 2011, at 10:51 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > Bob Sneidar wrote: > > > This is one of the reasons we did not switch to Vista or Windows 7. > > In XP signing was optional. In Vista and 7 it is mandatory. This is > > akin to malware infecting your computer and then charging you for a > > utility to "fix" it. It's only slightly better in that it will run > > without continually nagging you and getting in your way. But it's > > still an abominable practice. > > Personally, I think that's one of the thing MS did well. > > Security is a real issue on all OSes, and this provide one way to certify > that an app is what it says it is for just a one-time fee, without having to > give up 30% of your annual income to the OS vendor in perpetuity. ;) > > I wish that was an option for OS X as well. > > -- > Richard Gaskin > Fourth World > LiveCode training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com > Webzine for LiveCode developers: http://www.LiveCodeJournal.com > LiveCode Journal blog: http://LiveCodejournal.com/blog.irv > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
