Definitely feature-deprived in some areas for sure but still very capable DBMS, 
depending on what your needs are.   I haven't got round to benchmarks yet (and 
probably won't), but I've read several things on the web that suggest SQLite is 
much faster than mySQL.  Of course if SQLite is missing a feature you need, 
doesn't matter how much faster it is!

Pete Haworth

On Mar 22, 2011, at 11:13 AM, stephen barncard wrote:

> Having delved into LITE for about 5 minutes and only using MY the last few
> years I had the impression that LITE was a feature-deprived version of
> MYSQL.   Thanks for reporting.
> 
> On 22 March 2011 10:29, Peter Haworth <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Bob,
>> 
> 
> Stephen Barncard
> San Francisco Ca. USA
> 
> more about sqb  <http://www.google.com/profiles/sbarncar>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> [email protected]
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> 


_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to