Definitely feature-deprived in some areas for sure but still very capable DBMS, depending on what your needs are. I haven't got round to benchmarks yet (and probably won't), but I've read several things on the web that suggest SQLite is much faster than mySQL. Of course if SQLite is missing a feature you need, doesn't matter how much faster it is!
Pete Haworth On Mar 22, 2011, at 11:13 AM, stephen barncard wrote: > Having delved into LITE for about 5 minutes and only using MY the last few > years I had the impression that LITE was a feature-deprived version of > MYSQL. Thanks for reporting. > > On 22 March 2011 10:29, Peter Haworth <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Bob, >> > > Stephen Barncard > San Francisco Ca. USA > > more about sqb <http://www.google.com/profiles/sbarncar> > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
