On 06/04/2011 10:15 PM, Pete wrote:
I guess I'm still not sure why a user stack/card with images on it is better
than using the image library (I've asked before and never got a response).
Importing image files into the library assigns a unique image ID to them so
no conflicts. Once the images are in the library, they are available to any
LC application, they are included in standalones, and you can place buttons
with a reference to them on a card just by clicking a button in the image
library.
I don't do a lot of graphic work within LC so I'm probably missing something
obvious, but I'd love to know what it is.
I think the real objection to having lots of images in libraries is that
they
'suck' RAM like nobody's business and everything s l o w s d o w n t o
a horrible extent.
Pete
Molly's Revenge<http://www.mollysrevenge.com>
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Mark Wieder<mwie...@ahsoftware.net> wrote:
Richmond-
Saturday, June 4, 2011, 11:06:58 AM, you wrote:
You will not have an 'Image Libraries' folder until, either, you have
created one personal imahe library,
or you create a folder there yourself.
OK - I'll dump that one. I'm reasonably sure I didn't create it
myself, and if nobody else needs it I certainly don't.
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
