What about using ‘lock screen’? Then go card. For preopen it ‘shouldn’t’ make a difference but I have found this to be a cause for stammering in the past. Don’t bother putting an ‘unlock screen’ at the end of the preopencard or opencard as it will unlock itself at the end of the open sequence anyway (as I’m sure you’re already aware).
Sean > On 16 Dec 2020, at 05:55, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode > <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > I had my client try it. Adding "wait 0 milliseconds" after a "go card" > didn't make any difference really. The first four card changes were pretty > fast, and after that it got slower and slower with each subsequent card > change. I was watching her screen remotely but I couldn't see it due to how > remote viewing works, but she said the redraw was quite noticeable. > >> On 12/14/20 4:45 PM, merakosp via use-livecode wrote: >> Hello all, >> Does adding a <wait 0 milliseconds> after the <go card myCard> command make >> any difference? >> Cheers, >> Panos > > > -- > Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com > HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
