At the risk of getting flamed by some as an Apple lover, I think that may be harsh. Remember one of Microsoft's excuses for not producing a really modern OS for so long was that they had to maintain backwards compatibility for all their users. At some point this becomes a ball and chain for the vendor. Everyone gets less so that some won't be left behind. To a point that is all well and good. Beyond that point, I say leave them behind. What they have works for them. No one is taking anything away from people who do not upgrade. The situation is rather, if you want to upgrade, you will have to pay. Is that unfair?
Bob On Jul 28, 2011, at 12:26 AM, Warren Samples wrote: > On Thursday, July 28, 2011 01:41:57 AM Tiemo Hollmann TB wrote: >> I don't understand why they don't offer anymore any >> "classic download" option for backward compatibility for users who are not >> up to date every day like me. >> Tiemo > > > They're not interested in helping you to maintain your "backward" status. > Apple wants its users up to date, > with the program, and feeding them money through iTunes and the App Store. > > Best, > > Warren > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
