Is there a reason not to use the LC site URL, either alone or in addition
to the Wikipedia one?
Re: the errors, they look like examples of functions that would return
"false" but I haven't seen them in context.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
On June 16, 2022 8:33:45 AM David V Glasgow via use-livecode
<use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
Hi Folks,
I am writing a paper for publication (I hope) describing analysis of
internet predator messages achieved using Livecode.
I want to reference LC but I am not sure if there is a standard form or URL
for doing this. If not I am inclined to use
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LiveCode
Any alternative suggestions?
David Glasgow
PS Also, while trying to find a suitable URL I came across the ‘Cheat
Sheets’ page and PDFs, and stumbled on a couple of errors in the just LC
one… not sure who to alert.
// String
"foo" & "bar" is "foobar" "foo" && "bar" is "foo bar" "str" begins with "st"
"str" ends with "g"
// Chunks
char 5 of "str" is "n"
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
