Hi Richard,
Richard Gaskin wrote > > I asked Heather about that and apparently the team is using the list > manager's default settings, so it's not clear what more they can do. > > I've looked into this before, and it seems that if you need to parse > it you can do so reliably not by relying on cr&"From" but look instead > for cr&"From:". > > For example, if you look at message ID > <[email protected]> from this > month's archive you'll see Jan quoted Bob's full post, headers and > all, but the list manager indented the quoted "From:" string by one > space so it won't get confused with actual message boundaries. > > A bit non-standard, perhaps, but so far it seems reliable in the > archives I've worked with. > > So if you don't mind my asking: Why are you machine-parsing the > archives? More Lucene experiments? > I am reading the mailbox offline using this stack: http://at.livecodejournal.com/stacks/Mailbox_browser.zip http://andregarzia.on-rev.com/alejandro/stacks/Mailbox_browser.zip What if the problem is in the software that send the emails to this mail list? Could we ask developers to make a simple test sending the word: >From as the first word in a line and in the second line: Sent from Nabble... Al -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Error-in-mail-list-MBOX-file-format-2012-February-tp4378009p4379424.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
