On 5/2/12 12:39 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 5/2/12 12:30 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Ah, so it was a header issue after all.
You're justified if you want to gloat now. I'm sorry I sniped at you. If
it helps, you weren't the only one. The Husband hid in the basement.
I had the luxury of being half a continent away; I could simply hang up.
But Jack, his was a true survival scenario. :)
I think he's getting used to it. :)
But I don't remember you sniping at me at all.
Great! Check for Alzheimers.
What I find curious here is that this essential part of the header is
not a more transparent part of the httpHeaders documentation.
That's an important point. The first thing I tried was setting the
httpHeaders property to "Status: 200 OK". It did NOT work. I had to
write the string directly to stdout.
Odd. But at this point I don't care. I don't know if the extra "put ok"
is needed but I left it in.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
