On 6/1/12 1:46 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 6/1/12 12:30 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
My tip on the value of using stack files for data storage assumes that
the stack file has had its filename property set to an appropriate
location for writes.
I just thought of an interesting possibility: if the stack is included
in the engine folder and a script sets the filename to the documents
folder, will that copy it there?
If someone gets a chance to try this before I do, I'd like to know. Not
that it would be any faster than just using the copy or "save stack as"
command.
I imagine it would. I often just clone a template stack and set its
filename to whatever destination I need, then use the save command.
I was wondering if it would work without the "clone" part. I.e., since
the engine folder can't be changed, would it just make a copy or would
we get an error? Have to try it I guess.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [email protected]
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
