On 06/05/2012 09:59 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Alejandro Tejada <capellan2000@...> writes:

You are correct. This means that no one has written such exporters.
Well, not quite. I've done conversions to and from VB and html and javascript
and whatever when I've had to. It's not a very rewarding experience and it's not
really scalable or transportable to other conversion formats, though.


When I was doing my Masters degree at the "University" of Abertay about 8-9 years ago they were teaching us VB 5 (or was it 6 ?), and, frankly, it seemed pretty punk compared with
RunRev.

So I thought I would convert all the VB exercises into RunRev; after the first attempt I gave up,

[an incredibly long-winded exercise]

and rewrote each one directly in RunRev - in most cases more elegantly. Funnily enough, I found that by recreating everything in RunRev it allowed me reflect on what was rather better about RunRev as opposed to Visual Basic (apart from the fact that VB is confined to Windows), and learnt more by doing those recreations by far than what I was supposedly learning from the crappy course and the crappy lecturer.

Sadly, the media I had those stacks on got hosed a long time ago.

The only real reason I could see for that sort of exporter/converter was is the original code was vast, and to rewrite the whole thing would take considerably longer than writing the exporter/converter.

Probably time for a CASE and SDLC study at this point . . .


_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to