Richard, I do understand and appreciate your points. However: On 16/06/2012, at 11:06 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
> If nothing else, consider this democratically: > > Either multiple people must make a modest change, or one person must make a > modest change. I am looking at this in the most democratic way possible: *everyone* has had to adapt their email filters because a a handful of people refuse to update their address book. It seems fairer to me, that these people make the *extraordinary* effort of updating their addresses, rather than expecting everyone else to change their email filters, just so they can continue to use an email address that *has been changed* by the list administrator. I am a newbie here, and I complained. Others have sent replies showing a clear, despondent "you'll never get them to change" attitude. I would think that this is an indication that I'm not the only one that has been bothered. In any case, this is an largely unimportant topic, that I regret raising, and that has definitely overstayed its welcome. I think we should just let it die of natural causes, and let everyone make of it whatever they wish. Thank you all who sent helpful suggestions. -- Igor Couto Sydney, Australia _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
