While not the same thing as you are talking about, when I write scripts I use the "on" form for lc commands and handlers and any that are created soley by me I use the "command" form. This way it only takes a glance to know which are mine and which are built in.
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Peter Haworth <p...@lcsql.com> wrote: > This is something I've thought about too. Even for my own use, coming back > to code I haven't looked at for some time, it's sometimes hard to remember > where a handler is located. > > As part of the docs for my code, I have a script that goes through all the > scripts in a stack file, lists every handler alphabetically along with its > location and any other handlers that call it. That helps but some sort of > prefix (or suffix) notation sounds like a good idea. > > Pete > lcSQL Software <http://www.lcsql.com> > > > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:19 AM, stgoldb...@aol.com <stgoldb...@aol.com > >wrote: > > > more specifically, an "XC" to indicate that the handler for the word is > on > > the card, and "XS" to indicate that the handler is in the stack. In that > > way, it would be much clearer where to look for the meaning or the word, > > whether in the LiveCode dictionary, the card, or the stack. I wonder what > > other people on the forum think about using these prefixes. > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
