I think it depends on the usage. It also depends on your expectation for a classic drive with no SSD. Most recommend replacing a mission critical drive after 3 years whether or not you need to. Given that, an SSD drive may, with an adequate backup and recovery strategy, be a very good solution for those needing <loving> the speed gains, which are significant, especially for disk intensive operations.
Bob On Feb 8, 2013, at 11:03 AM, Colin Holgate wrote: > http://maxschireson.com/2011/04/21/debunking-ssd-lifespan-and-random-write-performance-concerns/ > > > On Feb 8, 2013, at 1:32 PM, Mark Wieder <mwie...@ahsoftware.net> wrote: > >> >>> The problem with pure SSDs is that they have a limited write-cycle lifetime. > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
