On 05/03/2013, at 7:47 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > If you want to store an array as the value of a custom property, I believe > that the array is stored in the same format you'd get if you ran the array > through arrayEncode. > > This hasn't been confirmed by RunRev, or even rigorously tested here, but > would reasonably explain why we can't use array syntax to access anything > deeper than the "natural" one-level deep properties.
I believe the problem is actually the ambiguity between a custom property and a custom property set when using multi-dimensional syntax. http://quality.runrev.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6912 I know there's another bug in there that I had input on but I can't seem to find it.... -- M E R Goulding Software development services Bespoke application development for vertical markets mergExt - There's an external for that! _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
