I have to agree it's pretty readable right now.
If you *really* want a shorter, less readable, way, try ....
put sin(pAngleInRadians) into tX
if tX <> 0 then divide tX by abs(tX)
-- Alex.
On 14/03/2013 17:56, [email protected] wrote:
Hi.
This is a pretty tight switch construct, of a typical form. And very readable.
What makes you feel it ought to be tightened?
Craig Newman
-----Original Message-----
From: Ender Nafi Elekçioğ
lu <[email protected]>
To: List LiveCode <[email protected]>
Sent: Thu, Mar 14, 2013 1:37 pm
Subject: Alternative To A Specific Switch Statement
Hello Dear LiveCode Gurus,
Here is a little code snippet:
__switch
____case sin(pAngleInRadians) > 0
______put 1 into tX
______break
____case sin(pAngleInRadians) = 0
______put 0 into tX
______break
____case sin(pAngleInRadians) < 0
______put -1 into tX
______break
__end switch
It's for a complex rotation command.
Is there a more elegant way to achieve the same result with built-in functions?
I mean, something like a combination of abs(), max() and/or round()?
Just an intellectual curiosity :)
Thanks for any insights...
Best,
~ Ender Nafi
~ · together, we're smarter · ~
~ · Keehuna Studio
~ · Sorcerers of Design
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
