On 06/20/2013 10:19 PM, Paul Looney wrote:
On Jun 20, 2013, at 12:15 PM, Richmond wrote:
On 06/20/2013 09:57 PM, Paul Looney wrote:
On Jun 20, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Richmond wrote:
But, maybe, just maybe, the idea of getting a year's use of Livecode for
500 bucks ... is a load of nonsense, and maybe, just maybe, end-users
would be prepared to stump up 500 bucks (or somesuch) for a version that did
not expire but had not upgrades built in,
instead.
Yes!
One year of upgrades - but the version does not expire - ever.
OK: I am extremely happy to find that I am wrong in this case.
Richmond.
I'm not saying you are wrong.
Blast!
I'm saying how I think it "should" be.
Glad you brought up the point; I agree that RunRev is doing themselves a
disservice with the new policy.
Paul Looney
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
