Monte,
Why do you want "this me" to have sense outside a behavior script, if
the only place where it will be used is in a behavior script?
Apparently, "this group", "this control" etc. is not a synonym of "me"
because currently "this group", "this control" etc. throws an execution
error while "me" doesn't. That makes "this group", "this control" etc. a
very feasible candidate.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer
KvK: 50277553
Use Color Converter to convert CMYK, RGB, RAL, XYZ, H.Lab and other
colour spaces. http://www.color-converter.com
Buy my new book "Programming LiveCode for the Real Beginner"
http://qery.us/3fi
Fill out this survey please
http://livecodebeginner.economy-x-talk.com/survey/
On 8/7/2013 22:56, Monte Goulding wrote:
On 08/08/2013, at 6:44 AM, Mark Schonewille <m.schonewi...@economy-x-talk.com>
wrote:
Behaviors used to be called parentScripts. An option could be "this parent".
Yes it could but it suffers the same problem of this behavior where it doesn't
make sense outside a behavior script.
Also, currently syntax of the form "this control", "this button", "this group" etc throws
an execution error. It would be very nice if this syntax would be used instead of "this me" and it would make
sense.
Probably a separate topic... they would be synonyms of me rather than this me I
think.
Cheers
--
Monte Goulding
M E R Goulding - software development services
mergExt - There's an external for that!
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
