Le 20 août 2013 à 16:28, Mark Wilcox a écrit : > It's distribution not use that counts in the GPL. If you put the download > behind a login then you could possibly argue that the distribution was > entirely internal, however, students are not generally under the control of > an organisation in the same way that employees are - a student could > legitimately argue that you gave them the binary, therefore you have to give > them the source code too. For a company with an internal distribution, > employees or sub-contractors are unlikely to raise the same objection. Even > if you did make source code available internally, you can contractually > prevent employees and sub-contractors from distributing it further, whatever > the license says. With students I don't think that's the case. > > Note that the GPL never forces you to publish your source code publicly when > distribution is limited, just that everyone who gets the binary also gets the > source and is free to pass it on to others.
Just for clarify : if i look in the binary of a standalone created by the community edition, i can see all the scripts aka the source code, no ? _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
