On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Mike Kerner <[email protected]> wrote: > And in addition, this "conspiracy" is by proxy. Does anyone else know of a > case where a conspiracy by proxy was found to violate this statute?
I don't know about this statute, but it's always enough to make one a conspirator--just being part of the agreement does that (and the agreement can be tacit instead of explicit). -- Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq. (702) 508-8462 _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
