Geoff-
Friday, September 13, 2013, 11:52:56 PM, you wrote:
> Can you post your code? I didn't see that. Here's mine for the two tests I
> did, and a simple put after looks 50% faster (90mb vs. 60mb):
Here's mine again, but I like your benchmarks. I did this with a
single repeat loop rather than your nested one, but otherwise I think
we're testing the same thing. I didn't stress-test this the way you
did with large data clumps, so I think I'd trust your conclusions for
real-world applications.
on mouseUp
local temp
local s
local accum
put "XXX" into temp
put the ticks into s
repeat 1000000 -- yes, that's a million
append temp, accum
end repeat
put the ticks - s into field 1
answer length(accum)
end mouseUp
command append pNew, @pString
put pNew after pString
end append
--
-Mark Wieder
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
