dunbarx wrote:
> He could be a valuable contributor, since some of his points are
> quite valid.
I think that's a fair assessment. He's obviously very bright and
energetic, and while he seems somewhat unfamiliar with the role of
common moderation in a forum I think the current thread he's
participating in can be quite productive.
And at the moment the only person he's insulting is me, and I don't
mind. His other points were on-topic and worthwhile.
To keep the current thread there productive I would encourage you folks
to stay on-topic with the theme laid out by the OP, MaxV, "What do you
suggest to promote Livecode?"
<http://forums.runrev.com/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=19273>
So far the conversation has stayed on-topic, and I hope it remains so,
as it's a valuable thread for all of us who have an interest in seeing
LiveCode adoption accelerate.
If you find anything there off-topic or needlessly contentious, please
don't take it further off-topic by replying there, but instead follow
the recommendations in the Forum Guidelines Heather posted for flagging
posts you feel are inappropriate:
<http://forums.runrev.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=18885>
The LiveCode forums are a valuable learning resource for the community,
and with your help we can maintain their role as a productive and
friendly environment for everyone to enjoy.
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World
LiveCode training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
Webzine for LiveCode developers: http://www.LiveCodeJournal.com
Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/FourthWorldSys
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
