Thanks, Richard. That lets me anticipate the new changes. I'm also modifying images and I'l convert that code to use byteToNum. Bill William Prothero http://es.earthednet.org
On Mar 13, 2014, at 9:44 AM, Richard Gaskin <ambassa...@fourthworld.com> wrote: > prothero wrote: > > > Mainly, what I was wondering is if the byteToNum command is the > > correct one. In images, its the convert character to number, but > > I thought the character commands for binary data were going to > > be deprecated. > > Yes, for comparing a single-byte value, byteToNum is the better choice. > > Very soon charToNum may involve multi-byte sequences for Unicode, so all code > that uses it where a single-byte value is needed should be updated to use > byteToNum instead. > > -- > Richard Gaskin > Fourth World > LiveCode training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com > Webzine for LiveCode developers: http://www.LiveCodeJournal.com > Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/FourthWorldSys > > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
