I wonder if they are taking advantage of color profiling now? This happened a whay back when Adobe introduced color correction to it’s line of products. Colors that looked and printed JUST FINE before, were now so incredibly off that old projects became unusable without major reworking.
It may be that the images have embedded profiles that were being ignored before, but are now being taken into account. Bob On Apr 2, 2014, at 13:25 , J. Landman Gay <jac...@hyperactivesw.com> wrote: > Has anyone noticed a difference in screengamma in the last couple of > releases? I've got some images here that look darker on Mac than they did a > while back (not sure when it changed, but it's only a few weeks.) Setting the > screengamma in the message box to 2.2 fixes it, but the default 1.7 used to > be okay. > > -- > Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com > HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
