I see, so he's only calling ck once at the end. I had thought it was part of a longer sequence where it was interspersed throughout. In that case you're quite right and the logging handler doesn't matter. But that leaves the question of what those 38s are doing in there with 0 milliseconds between them.
On April 13, 2014 5:16:26 PM CDT, Alex Tweedly <a...@tweedly.net> wrote: >On 13/04/2014 23:02, J. Landman Gay wrote: >> Except we don't know how intensive the ck handler is. >> >Do we need to ? >stp[4] and stp[5] are set before 'ck' is called. So (assuming the >numbers that are eventually output are the ones being passed) we don't >care what else is being done in ck, other than outputting these values. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
