On 9 Dec 2014, at 1:48 am, Geoff Canyon <gcan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why? I know we don't have detailed documentation on the syntax morphing > functionality, but why would this be any different than the other examples > that have been given of how we'll be able to tweak the language? Depending > on the implementation it might be complex (if there isn't a generic way to > refer to objects) or simple (if there is), but either way it should at > least be possible, yes?
Well... I could be wrong but I expect that we will get widgets (a way to create new object types) and then more general extensions to declare command syntax but I'm not expecting to be able to add a property to an existing object. As I said I could be wrong... -- M E R Goulding Software development services Bespoke application development for vertical markets mergExt - There's an external for that! _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
