I previously advised that I first noticed the performance hit in modTableField during testing for Bernd and have advised Bernd of my findings.
He has replied with this email and I also have listed my reply: ————————————— > On 7 Mar 2015, at 16:35, Niggemann, Bernd wrote: > > here is a modTableField that is coupled to a resizeStack handler in the card. > > If you use 7.x.x and load it with 2500 rows it gets sluggish, if you resize > it with less it gets faster, > Using 6.7.3 it is almost smooth with 2500 rows. > > Is this the performance you see? Is it better or worse? > > > I never use the Geometry Manager although it is tempting; apparently the > Geometry Manager can get tripped up in later stages of a project and that is > a major hassle. > > I do all my geometry myself. More code but very good control over geometry. LC 6.7.3 I find: 1000 rows perfect. 2500 rows nearly perfect 5000 rows a little sluggish LC 7.0.3 I find: 1000 rows a little sluggish. 2500 rows sluggish 5000 rows unacceptable I have thought my self that using the Geometry Manager seems sometimes to be unreliable and occasionally seems to loose where it’s up to. Probably your right to do the geometry in script as at least you know where your up to. The only problem is if you have a busy user interface it could involve many lines of script. Bernd, I hope you don’t mind but I will post this subjective email onto the list. It emphasises the disparity in visual performance between 6.7.3 and 7.0.3. Its a shame you can’t right align numbers in 6.7.3. All the best Terry ————————————— _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
