Originally we had the check to prevent us making typos and such. As I have previously said, it is exactly designed to be extensible. Once 8.0 reaches GM, you can rely on that handler being a no-op.
If you have any suggestions about improvements to the system it would be good to hear them. I think at the moment there is a slight lack of flexibility in terms of the info that can be returned along with the message. On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 at 18:04, Mark <mwie...@ahsoftware.net> wrote: > The new LC8 IDE implements the publish-and-subscribe pattern, > but it looks like it isn't designed to be extensible. It's extensible > right now because revIDEMessageIsValid() always returns true. > > Q: assuming that the validity check was an interim test to make sure > the IDE didn't fall on its face, can we rely on this mechanism as a way > to register callback events in the IDE, and thus extend and modify > the IDE? > > -- > Mark Wieder > ahsoftw...@gmail.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
