> On 26 Oct. 2016, at 3:26 pm, Dr. Hawkins <doch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > ON a "wait 0 with messages", does this effectively put the next line in the > queue as the last (first? random?) entry for the current (next?) > millisecond?
I think I'll need an interpreter to understand that question sorry ;-) > > I had always blithely figured that it would resume once there were no > eligible messages, but that doesn't sound like the case. It checks to see if there’s a message to handle at the current time handles it (removing it from the head of the queue) if there is checks if the wait time has elapsed if not it iterates again So if you had two messages in the queue scheduled for exactly the same time and only did a wait 0 with messages then only one would be sent. Cheers Monte _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
