On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Peter TB Brett <peter.br...@livecode.com> wrote:
> > > On 26/10/2016 14:42, Trevor DeVore wrote: >> >> Peter, >> >> I agree that in most cases you don’t want people bypassing these warnings. >> There are situations in software development where people testing software >> against staging servers need to connect over https without the >> verification >> step. That is why I had to implement it in my custom libURL version. >> > > There are several other enormously superior options. > Perhaps, but for testing purposes we don’t really care about implementing them :-) Here is my question for you - are you arguing that LiveCode (a development tool) should not have the ability to allow a developer to create an application that allows a self-signed certificated that can’t be verified to bypass the verification process for that particular server? -- Trevor DeVore ScreenSteps www.screensteps.com - www.clarify-it.com _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode