William Prothero wrote:
> Code signing is very frustrating and time-wasting. I second, third,
> and fourth all recommendations to make the app deployment process
> easier for both standalone systems and mobile. I disagree that it
> should only be in the commercial version, though. Indy users
> distribute apps too.
Ah, yes, I'd forgotten about the split feature sets.
For the record, for me to be motivated to chip in, anything that
facilitates iOS deployment must be in Indy as well as Business.
And for all other platforms where distribution is compatible with the
GPL, any community-funded enhancements need to also be in the Community
Edition.
The features proposed here are security features, and those making free
and open software have as much need for security as anyone else.
But for myself this applies to all community-funded features: no
Community Edition, no dice.
Fortunately, to date I believe all community-funded features have been
included in all three editions, Community, Indy, and Business. I trust
that won't change, as it would only reduce the pool of potential
contributors, and further exacerbate the challenges of transforming into
a true open source project.
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
____________________________________________________________________
ambassa...@fourthworld.com http://www.FourthWorld.com
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
