On 30 Dec 2016, at 12:41, Skip Kimpel wrote:
+1
LC needs to reconsider breaking up functionality based upon licensing.
Indeed! I haven't looked in depth at the differences, but I thought it
was more (or even entirely) about support, which makes sense for
high-level business requirements, plus a turnover threshold, which is
about common sense (appropriate recompense for lucrative use). With the
open-source Community edition, only allowing open-source standalones is
eminently logical. But limiting functionality in the way just revealed
feels decidedly unfriendly, a bit like devs are being milked.
:'(
k
---
Keith Martin
Senior Lecturer, LCC (University of the Arts London)
Technical Editor, MacUser magazine (1997-2015)
http://PanoramaPhotographer.com
http://thatkeith.com
+44 (0)7909541365
---
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
