> On 18 Jul 2017, at 5:59 pm, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode > <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > I think it is worth having a preference for both highlighting and completion > - it serves people's individual tastes, and as long as the preference is > discoverable then it won't add any complexity.
OK, I’ll open a report about those > > Ideally highlighting would be context aware - so outside of a string, it > highlights other brackets outside of strings; but when in a string it > highlights brackets in strings: > > put (1 "a(2" & tVar ")2" )1 after tFoo > > (Numbers used to indicate matching pairs) I think it doesn’t currently do what you are suggesting but in the case above it does what you want anyway ;-) > > I was thinking in terms of syntactically - missing the point of in-string > highlighting (as HH and Mark Wieder pointed out). > > Indeed, the current approach is an approximation to the ideal and adding { > and } to highlighting wouldn't do any harm; and would serve the use-case of > JSON and similar generation. > > In terms of ' then, for much the same reason that would probably be useful - > although that might require a bit more work on the highlighting code as it > isn't a matched pair (@montegoulding?). Should be the same as quote so not a big issue if it’s helpful. Cheers Monte _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode