Yeah, I started to skim the security notes at
<https://www.rethinkdb.com/docs/security/>, but when I got to this:

   The best way to secure a RethinkDB cluster is to run it
   on a protected network that doesn’t allow access from the
   outside world. However, this may not always be feasible.
   For example, cloud deployments often require access from
   wide area networks.

   There are two main methods RethinkDB provides for securing
   the cluster: TLS encryption for connections, and binding
   the ports the server uses to specific IP addresses to limit
   outside connections.

...at that point I had to remind myself of other things demanding my attention. :) So tempting as it is, setting up a secure cluster is not something I'll be exploring soon.

Keep us posted. Interesting system....

--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Systems


Tom Glod wrote:

to answer your question, the database cluster will be accepting connections
and queries from clients directly.

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Tom Glod <tom at makeshyft.com> wrote:

Hi Richard .....  like Alex said, there is no Rest api for RethinkDB.  The
folks at RethinkDB didn't want to expose the whole query language using a
rest api, (if i recall correctly they said it is too powerful to do
so)...so the driver only accepts queries via driver port and streams
resulting json and updates back to client.

My desktop client will connect to a local database which (will or can be
part) of a distributed cluster.







On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode <
use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:

I was thinking the same thing. This isn't a database function per se,
it's more like a sockets function.

Bob S


> On Aug 5, 2017, at 16:42 , Tom Glod via use-livecode <
use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> If you go to this page ..... the specs say that it all happens through
an
> tcp/ip  connection where you make a connection, serialize the query and
> send it ....  the db driver port receives queries, and streams data from
> the db via the TCP/IP back to "subscribed" client.
>
> So it doesn't really need to have anything to do with the current
> revdatabase functions....which the posts seem to be talking about.  I'm
not
> asking for a rewrite of db layer.

_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to