> On 11 Aug 2017, at 11:45 am, Mark Wieder via use-livecode 
> <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> You know, if you'd post what you're trying to do it might be more possible to 
> stay on target here. For instance, I regularly have to fill an array with 
> constants in an initialization routine or use a custom property array filled 
> with constants. Is that any help? Or are you looking to make a macro 
> processor? Or a library of common <things>? Or something else?

A library of common <things> is probably the best description at the moment but 
the use case is not reusable handlers as we have other means for that.

Basically anything where you follow a common pattern to do a thing but you 
can’t abstract away so you don’t have to write the pattern any more.


use-livecode mailing list
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 

Reply via email to