> On 11 Aug 2017, at 11:45 am, Mark Wieder via use-livecode
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> You know, if you'd post what you're trying to do it might be more possible to
> stay on target here. For instance, I regularly have to fill an array with
> constants in an initialization routine or use a custom property array filled
> with constants. Is that any help? Or are you looking to make a macro
> processor? Or a library of common <things>? Or something else?
A library of common <things> is probably the best description at the moment but
the use case is not reusable handlers as we have other means for that.
Basically anything where you follow a common pattern to do a thing but you
can’t abstract away so you don’t have to write the pattern any more.
use-livecode mailing list
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription