In my opinion the focus should be on performance which has been slow down approx. 9 times compared to version 6. You can build as much as “features” as you want but this should never hit the performance of the product. Just my two cents.
On 31/08/2018, 06:41, "use-livecode on behalf of Brian Milby via use-livecode" <use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com on behalf of use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: >Isn’t this somewhat possible in LCB now? I know there isn’t really any >documentation on how to write the syntax, but there are the examples of the >built in libraries. But, the added syntax would only work in LCB code. > >Thanks, >Brian >On Aug 30, 2018, 11:31 PM -0500, Geoff Canyon via use-livecode ><use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>, wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 2:42 PM Martin Koob via use-livecode < >> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: >> >> > I wonder if Open Language will get some attention.. >> > >> >> Open Language was always my favorite feature. I'd still like to be able to >> grow/morph the syntax. >> _______________________________________________ >> use-livecode mailing list >> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com >> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription >> preferences: >> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode >_______________________________________________ >use-livecode mailing list >use-livecode@lists.runrev.com >Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription >preferences: >http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
