on 2/1/02 5:49 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Yep. Even better if it were like an output module, with the ability to >> select PocketPC as the build type. >> >> -- >> Troy >> RPSystems >> www.rpsystems.net > > If this does actually happen, I agree that designing the apps on a desktop > PC or Mac would be easier than on the PocketPC itself. If you've ever seen > the PalmOS emulator that developers use, I think that type of environment > would be ideal. Not necessarily a full-blown PocketPC emulator, but at > least locking the window resolution and memory requirements to the > capabilities of the device. You could event overlay an image (skin) so the > app appears to be running on the actual device. That's my 2 cents worth. > Does anyone else want to share their "vision" of what would be the ideal > PocketPC Revolution development environment? ----------- I'd think both would be necessary. The development mod that frames the operations that will work in the PocketPC, and a distribution builder that does a similar thing.
My .02 worth. Best regards, Ken N. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
