At 11:59 PM +0100 2/10/02, Pierre Delain wrote: >I find out with great surprise and disappointment that Revolution is much >slower then HyperCard. >I have a stack with 2163 cards, and a script containing the following loop :
I love a challenge like this :-) I wrote a script similar to the one given, to go through the Revolution Language reference (1263 cards) looking for "card" in the three fields: comments, summary, examples. This was on a PowerBook G3 400. Going from one card to the next with the screen unlocked took 50 seconds. The visual cost is significant: Going from one card to the next with the screen locked took 14 seconds. Delivering messages takes time: Going through the cards with the screen and messages locked took 6 seconds. But there's no need to actually go to the cards: Using the form: fld "comments" of cd i of stack "revDocsLanguageReference" took 90 ticks (1.5 seconds) Setting the defaultStack property and simply using fld "comments" of cd i took 53 ticks (<1 second) Finally, pre-loading the data into an array variable instead was faster still (not counting the time to load the array): 9 ticks. Using one of the built-in functions (Filter is my favorite) on a pre-built data set would probably be even faster. regards, Geoff _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
