On 1/3/02 3:19 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am just curious about the difference between the way patterns are handled > between a PC and a Mac. For instance: > > I can import a pattern into my PC stack, assign this same pattern to several > buttons (stacked on top of each other) with the patterns starting at 0,0, > coordinates in each button (i.e. the pattern is redrawn for each button with > the upper left corner starting at the upper left corner of the button). > > If I then transfer this stack to a Macintosh, the buttons represent the > pattern as if the pattern were the size of the stack (or screen). In other > words, the pattern is reflected differently in every button on the Mac (the > pattern is not redrawn at a 0,0, coordinate for each button). > > I know patterns are 'natively' different on each platform, but this is odd > (and I would think this is wrong). > > Can anyone verify/explain this?
>From the docs: Pattern images can be color or black-and-white. To be used on Mac OS systems, patterns must be 128x128 pixels or less, and both its height and width must be a power of 2. To be used on Windows and Unix systems, height and width must be divisible by 8. Does that explain it? Kevin Kevin Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.runrev.com/> Runtime Revolution Limited - Power to the Developer! Tel: +44 (0) 870 747 1165. Fax: +44 (0)1639 830 707. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
