January 22, 1998 From: Jonathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
I've reviewed this new description and it looks to be directed at organizations that count developer seats too restrictively, leaving the revolution folks with the problem of supporting large numbers of pseudo developers. If this reading is correct then the distinction between commercial (or shareware) developers who provide users with finished products and companies that turn each user into a potential revolution developer is not especially problematic. In fact it is fair for these companies to purchase additional developer seats to cover the floating usage. If, on the other hand, this is an attempt to generate a new type of income based on the use of software written using revolution, we have a serious problem that must be addressed immediately. J/ >On Wednesday, April 3, 2002, at 02:44 PM, Chipp Walters wrote: > >> Does anyone know anything about this? They call it an "Installation=20 >> License." I'd sure like to know more... >> http://www.runrev.com/revolution/licensesfaq.html > > >I encourage everyone to provide feedback to the Revolution folks on >this problematic new fee. I believe that Kevin is the appropriate >person to send email to. > > >Bill Vlahos _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
