On Monday, April 8, 2002, at 05:18 PM, Geoff Canyon wrote:
> Interesting -- Since * matches zero or more of any character, I > would have thought that "*" would match the empty string, and thus > wouldn't filter anything. It appears I was mistaken. "?*" is clearer. Dar Scott _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
