At 9:58 PM -0700 4/15/02, Geoff Canyon wrote: >I wrote a routine that did the above 200 times in a row, and saw no >increase over time. So I wonder if some resource/buffer is being >allocated for the command that isn't being given up, but that >doesn't get _re_allocated, meaning that it's not a leak but just an >extra requirement. Not sure.
Thanks for testing that, Geoff. I'm running Mac OS 9.1; perhaps that explains our different result. I'll post the problem code in the Improve list to be checked out there. Karl _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
