On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 07:29 PM, Jeanne A. E. DeVoto wrote:
> There's no reason it should. It's not in the pendingMessages at > that point, > since you haven't used "send in time" to send a mouseUp message. OK. I guess pendingMessages is only for "pending messages" sent by "send in time". If, during my execution of my handler, some mouse clicks come in, some "send in time" come due, and some call-backs are ready, in what order are these executed at the end of the handler? Or, put another way. When the engine has several choices as to what message to process, which one is? If you have to run tests, well, I can do that. But if there are exceptions for some call-backs or some input messages, then I might miss those. Dar Scott _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
