On 11/4/02 5:58 pm, "Jeanne A. E. DeVoto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed:
This "@v" business is new to me. I'm presuming the @ is similar to using VAR in PASCAL for parameters: function test(var v:integer); Compared to function test(v:integer); A pointer to the variable is passed rather than the content? Is there anything else hidden away like using ^ or ^^ to reference pointers and handles? Which give better performace, using @ for parameters or no @? Is there a point whereby you'd use @, e.g. Variable is larger than 500 bytes? >> Is there a clean way to test this? Currently I'm using a pragmatic test: >> >> function isArray @v >> if v <> empty then return false >> return (the keys of v <> empty) >> end isArray >> >> Is this reasonable? Is there a more 'official' way? > _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
