On Monday, October 14, 2002, at 01:13 AM, Simon Forster wrote: > > So you're saying stick with it, that RunRev isn't bad at all? I have > to say that I love the idea of an easy to use, high level tool which > is cross platform – it's just that the implementation seems a little > weak. > > I downloaded the try-out version earlier this week and have spent > around 6 hours playing with it. So far, I have had a few "this program > has unexpectedly quit..." dialog boxes (due to Mac OS X 10.2 > appearance manager apparently), the Animation Manager ate my text > field and Geometry Manager seems, as I said, somewhat buggy in its > behaviour.
Try not to count the OS X appearance manager crashes towards the overall quality of Rev. It's unfortunate OS X is doing this appearance manager crash to Rev (or vice-versa) and I'm sure it will go away with the next release of Rev. I haven't been using the Geometry manager or Animation manager, but overall I think that Revolution is pretty solid for a version 1.x product. (Although the metacard base of runrev is version 4.x? I still don't understand the details at this level) Alex Rice, Software Developer Architectural Research Consultants, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
